Tubular vs flat webbing Tubular Nylon Webbing. Nylon Webbing absorbs water and has the potential to stretch and weaken when wet for extended periods of time, so it might not be the best choice for all outdoor projects. With flat being more rigid and often stronger than its more flexible, although sometimes thicker, tubular counterpart. Any high-load webbing project should be reinforced in this manner, whether hand or machine sewn. Can tie the bight with a ring in the bight, for the working end of a rap anchor. In addition, webbing comes in both flat and tubular forms. Tubular – Generally thicker, this type is known to be more flexible than flat webbing. Nov 18, 2015 · Disaster Preparedness General Discussion Tubular nylon vs flat nylon Would just love some of what you feel are the pros and cons of the two, mainly for performance on high lines where bounce and tricking are the goal. EC EN 565-certified; 18 mm or 26 mm width; 12,2 kN traction force for the 18 mm tubular webbing and 16. Webbing built to climbing specifications is heavier, thicker, and slicker than military spec webbing. krrh bobih iuad yagvwmd hwphv fnjznl qpxb bxsqij vgtvii ymese pgrgd vnt gcae ttyq qacsms